Although a defendant is not entitled to absolute certainty in all phases of the criminal process State v. In the absence of a timely designation of the defendant's sentence as concurrent with or consecutive to his prior undischarged term of imprisonment, the common-law rule prevails, and the sentence will be treated as concurrent. After the passage of ninety days, the trial court lacked the authority to repair its omission from the defendant's original sentence. The failure to follow a procedural rule is similarly erroneous. This court has held that a trial court's failure to follow the mandatory provisions of a statute prescribing trial procedures is plain error.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |